Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adrian Andreev vs Philip Florig Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Andreev vs Florig analysis and find out who is favored!
Adrian Andreev vs Philip Florig Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Andreev 1 - 0 Florig
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Andreev has won 50.52% of points on their second serve, while Florig has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Andreev, in recent form, has won 55.1% of their opponent's second serve points, while Florig has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.73% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Andreev has saved 54.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Florig has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Andreev has won 52.11% of matches played (W/L 37/ 34), with Florig winning 33.33% (W/L 5/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Andreev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 110/ 68), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Florig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 24/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Andreev has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.03% of matches (W/L 35/ 31), where as Florig has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.45% of matches (W/L 5/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Andreev winning 1 times and Florig being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Andreev winning 2 and Florig winning 0. The last match between Andreev and Florig was at the M25 Wetzlar, 05-08-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Adrian Andreev getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Andreev and Florig have played a deciding set 0 times, with Andreev winning 0 times and Florig 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Andreev winning 0, and Florig 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Andreev has played against opponents with an average rank of 325.15 while Florig has played against players with an average rank of 142.6.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Andreev has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Florig has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Andreev has converted 43.28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Florig has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
235
Rank
183
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
851
Rank
842
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
57% (174-133)
Career Total W/L
42% (40-55)
57% (21-16)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$98,110
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Adrian Andreev | Philip Florig |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:0 | 1:47:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (38/59) | 54% (37/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (28/38) | 57% (21/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 45% (14/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (33/68) | 34% (20/59) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats 
Adrian Andreev
Player
Philip Florig
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adrian Andreev | Philip Florig |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (21/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (49/38) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (436/398) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 85 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:54 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 372.51 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1758/2623) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (1157/1758) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (437/865) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (132/305) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1166/2776) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (20/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (21/37) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 46% (6/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (20/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (20/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 24% (17/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Adrian Andreev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Adrian Andreev
58%
(
52 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Denis Yevseyev
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
85 of
121)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
85)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
121)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Adrian Andreev
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Rodrigo Fernandes
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Adrian Andreev
69%
(
83 of
120)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
54 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
108
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Andreev
Player
Darwin Blanch
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Billy Harris
Player
Adrian Andreev
67%
(
68 of
102)
1st Serve %
73%
(
77 of
106)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Philip Florig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Philip Florig
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
49
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henrique Rocha
Player
Philip Florig
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
47%
(
20 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(6) ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Philip Florig
48%
(
48 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
4
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
47%
(
25 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
102
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominik Boehler
Player
Philip Florig
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
John Hallquist Lithen
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
2
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Paty
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
20
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
39 of
47)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
17 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
Arthur Nagel
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Florig
Player
Mariano Dedura-Palomero
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
19 of
32)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Player
Philip Florig
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Andreev Vs Florig Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Adrian Andreev
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
